If M95 think that it can be both Verona and Trento, perfect! Another city to visit, more work and more miles. I think Trento is in an ideal position to make a pass between Austria and Italy. Among other things, the path already exists. My idea of eliminating Verona is because it is very close to another major city, Bologna...Superdavecan wrote:I don't support the idea of deleting Verona, or any of the other SCS cities for that matter. I'm not convinced that the rest of the ProMods team would accept that either. Rebuilds, however, are a different story... many of the SCS cities, particularly the larger ones, could do with a rebuild.Fra98 wrote:
In my opinion, the best solution is "delete" Verona and add Trento and Bologna (in the future).
Bolzano is too nearby to Innsbruck and Bologna is a very important city in Italy, so I think That it would be added in each case.
To approach to Slovenia instead suggest Trieste or Gorizia.
I hope that isn't impossible to do.
I checked out your concept map though. It's a reasonable concept, although personally I would have done a few things differently...
- Again, I don't think Verona should be deleted. M95 says that Bolzano and Verona will both fit, but even then I don't think that either Trento or Bolzano is strictly necessary. It's a lot harder to build cities in mountainous areas too.
In my opinion, Olbia is important, Because is a port. Cagliari is the most important city in Sardinia (and a port) and it is worth inserting it in the map.- Does Sardinia need all three of Olbia, Oristano and Cagliari? I'm convinced Oristano can go... although I definitely think that greater Italian representation is needed, it shouldn't be overcrowded like Denmark... Denmark has proportionally way too many cities, so I'd try not to go in that direction.
Oristano, however, is not very big and I inserted to make "a bridge" between Olbia and Cagliari (and also because I have many relatives over there), but for me it is not strictly necessary ...
Good idea, I completely agree!- I don't think Grosseto is needed, and instead I would build Florence, even if it's a bit close to both Bologna and Livorno. Cities in close proximity do exist in the game... for example, in Belgium ProMods has built Antwerp very close to Brussels, in the UK they built Croydon which in fact is part of Greater London, and in the Netherlands I understand that they have plans to build Utrecht, which is very close to Amsterdam. As long as the cities aren't built particularly big, shouldn't be a problem for Florence to fit in the middle.
Yes, I inserted Civitavecchia because it's a port...- Civitavecchia is only intended as the ferry terminal, right? I wouldn't build it as a city with jobs, just as a ferry terminal.
Yes, a ferry terminal, like the zone near Rostock, Burg a. Fehmarn and Kobenhavn.- Is Reggio Calabria really needed as well as Messina? (Unless it's only for the ferry terminal)
Yes, Ancona between Bologna and Pescara, and Foggia could replace Bari.- Possibly Ancona and Foggia?
Another good idea, we will see what will decide M95That's just my opinion. All the same, good job
Other things that I wouldn't mind... I would like to see San Marino in the game, similar to how they built Liechtenstein. It's doable; they just need to create an entrance from where Rimini would be. And then, it might be a bit crazy but it could be interesting to build a ferry connection from Pozzallo to Valletta, Malta. It's very small but maybe Malta could be another one of these small countries.
@all It's just my personal opinion, M95 job is very good and I hope that he will continue well!
Oh, sorry for my bad English!
