Page 502 of 529

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 29 Dec 2019 13:19
by U&I
yeah btw Ceuta and Melilla are AFRICAN cities. And SCS won't map Africain cities because they are devlopping a game named EURO Truck Simulator 2.
Then i think they will obviously not map these two cities which actually sucks :/

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 29 Dec 2019 13:34
by CptCaribbean
Ceuta and Melilla, despite they are in african territory, they geographically act as spanish (so european) cities.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 29 Dec 2019 15:36
by U&I
yeah, thats in the schengen area

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 29 Dec 2019 16:37
by PirriAND
CptCaribbean wrote:
29 Dec 2019 13:34
Ceuta and Melilla, despite they are in african territory, they geographically act as spanish (so european) cities.
Like the French Guyana which is 100% EU territory despite Cayenne (capital) being closer to Miami than Paris :lol:



But i wish SCS would include the WHOLE Iberian peninsula and wouldn't leave out Andorra and Gibraltar.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 29 Dec 2019 17:15
by Omicron
I guess it doesn't help the matter that there are no borders currently on the map indicating Andorra and Gibraltar...

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 29 Dec 2019 18:27
by jakub1231
U&I wrote:
29 Dec 2019 15:36
yeah, thats in the schengen area
Ceuta and Melilla aren’t in Schengen area - they are excluded from Schengen, but these teritories are in EU

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 29 Dec 2019 19:59
by U&I
they actually are.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 29 Dec 2019 21:06
by EdgeGladiator
In my opinion, these places will only be done if SCS has finished completing Spain and Portugal well, with enough roads and enough cities. For example, it would make no sense at all to have Ceuta and Melilla, and not to have cities like Pamplona, ​​Burgos, Badajoz, Teruel, Almeria, Bayonne or Viseu.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 29 Dec 2019 21:47
by ScuL
I think you will find your answer when you look at the rest of the map. Liechtenstein was omitted, Italy DLC doesn't contain San Marino or a reference to the Vatican either. I would say (but am not certain) that it's very unlikely SCS will develop Andorra and Gibraltar

Re: Development on version 2.x (Iberian Peninsula Project)

Posted: 29 Dec 2019 22:22
by PirriAND
Exactly.

That why we know that Gibraltar, Balearic Islands, Canary Islands, Ceuta, Melilla, Azores and Madeira will be coming to ETS2 but NOT, through SCS but rather Promods. Just like Andorra