loupdargent wrote: ↑15 Nov 2017 02:56
Yeah, i think that states in the Midwest are the less expected, because it's mainly flat grasslands and fields.
But this makes me think that the development here would be faster (and perhaps more work focused on the cities there), and a not so long wait to reach the east, which is more forested and mountainous
The Appalachian Range is very low in elevation, they are more like hills compared to the Western US, I struggle to call it a proper mountain range. I'll agree somewhat with forested, though most of the forests have been clear cut and made into farmland over the centuries, The forests tend to be more sporadic outside of New England and the Appalachian Range the good news is that forest is fairly deciduous which is a good change of pace for forests in the game which is highly dominated by conifers at present. Florida itself has its own unique ecosystem and forests due to the tropical weather and unique soil composition.
n4gix.bill.leaming wrote: ↑14 Nov 2017 18:36
Texas is just miles and miles of nothing but miles and miles...
I suppose for the areas North of Huston this probably is the best description of the environment, mostly grasslands for what seems an eternity. Though El Paso has some desert area and mountains nearby they are probably too out of the way to be included in the game, As you approach Huston though the scene takes a tropical turn so its not all hopeless that something emerges among all the cowboy/dude ranches out that way.
Mercedes2002CZ wrote: ↑14 Nov 2017 21:34
And what about middle states like Kansas, Misouri, Nebraska etc.
What about it? just endless expanse of wheat, corn and sometimes barley, The badlands might count as something different though the rest of the area is just farms and prairie forever.