Iberian Peninsula Development
- realdeal350
- Developer
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: 09 Feb 2014 02:14
May be something to look forward to ![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Spain developer
Canada developer
Regional Co-ordinator for the Roman region
Languages: English, italiano
Canada developer
Regional Co-ordinator for the Roman region
Languages: English, italiano
I looked to the plan and its good.But I have three suggestions:
1 - How about Faro instead Portimão? Because Faro is bigger.
2 - How about making León and Salamanca? Or making León and Valladolid and not making Burgos? Or even making all 4 cities? Because this are is a bit empty.
3 - How about Cordoba instead Linares and building Linares as a scenery city? Because Cordoba is bigger.
These are only suggestions.Developer can make these or not.I will be happy.
1 - How about Faro instead Portimão? Because Faro is bigger.
2 - How about making León and Salamanca? Or making León and Valladolid and not making Burgos? Or even making all 4 cities? Because this are is a bit empty.
3 - How about Cordoba instead Linares and building Linares as a scenery city? Because Cordoba is bigger.
These are only suggestions.Developer can make these or not.I will be happy.
- realdeal350
- Developer
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: 09 Feb 2014 02:14
Well tbh I think that Portimão would be better scenery-wise because of the river+the coast. Also, city size isn't the number one thing we look at when considering adding a city.
For your second point, this is kind of a sketchy plan
I will most likely add/remove some cities on the map
For your second point, this is kind of a sketchy plan
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Spain developer
Canada developer
Regional Co-ordinator for the Roman region
Languages: English, italiano
Canada developer
Regional Co-ordinator for the Roman region
Languages: English, italiano
Braga, Albacete and Valladolid are three key towns that are missing, and it surely shouldn't be a problem to fit them in.
I don't think Canary Islands and Madeira should be included. There is barely any truck traffic on these islands (or only when ATS assets are available, they're volcanic islands with minimal vegetation; otherwise it's quite a pointless idea).
I don't think Canary Islands and Madeira should be included. There is barely any truck traffic on these islands (or only when ATS assets are available, they're volcanic islands with minimal vegetation; otherwise it's quite a pointless idea).
Why not both? Portugal is large enough to have the two of those. It will take a while before realdeal gets there, but it is something to look forward to. It wouldn't be overkill either.MYE2001 wrote: 1 - How about Faro instead Portimão? Because Faro is bigger.
I won't make any comment as by seeing realdeal's progress, cities are actually decided whether they are built or not as long as he keeps building. Look at Lleida, for example. Also, Manresa and Tarrasa I suppose they will appear on the job market as parts of Barcelona to avoid cluttering it.
I'll only suggest having a look at this truck traffic measuring map (http://www.fomento.gob.es/NR/rdonlyres/ ... os2013.pdf) as it show what road do trucks actually use and not. For example, trucks avoid AP-2 between Lleida and Zaragoza and use the N-II instead.
I'll only suggest having a look at this truck traffic measuring map (http://www.fomento.gob.es/NR/rdonlyres/ ... os2013.pdf) as it show what road do trucks actually use and not. For example, trucks avoid AP-2 between Lleida and Zaragoza and use the N-II instead.
I won't say much because last time I gave my (too much detailed) opinion I got some nasty reactions, so I'll just keep this short: can't wait to see the rest of this map, hoping it will be as beautiful as Barcelona area.realdeal350 wrote:I have made a concept map (because I was bored)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Albacete and Valldolid can be made,but I think Braga is too close to Porto.And about Portimão,I`m not sure that it will fit if Faro will be made.HighFlyerPL185 wrote:Braga, Albacete and Valladolid are three key towns that are missing, and it surely shouldn't be a problem to fit them in.
I don't think Canary Islands and Madeira should be included. There is barely any truck traffic on these islands (or only when ATS assets are available, they're volcanic islands with minimal vegetation; otherwise it's quite a pointless idea).
Why not both? Portugal is large enough to have the two of those. It will take a while before realdeal gets there, but it is something to look forward to. It wouldn't be overkill either.MYE2001 wrote: 1 - How about Faro instead Portimão? Because Faro is bigger.
-
- Posts: 467
- Joined: 01 Aug 2013 22:19
- Donation rank:
- Location: Sevilla
would tarragona and donostia fit?
-
- Information
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: christopher123, Frozen1, kdl2010, sompet and 0 guests