Page 41 of 108

Re: Development on version 1.x (British Columbia Edition)

Posted: 26 Apr 2020 18:36
by MrDilkington10
I think Option A is the best, that way we can play with the rest while you guys are able to give the Sea-to-Sky the love it deserves :D

Re: Development on version 1.x (British Columbia Edition)

Posted: 27 Apr 2020 03:09
by zebenji
chrissav2002 wrote:
23 Apr 2020 17:20
Look at a map : between BC and Ontario there is 3 provinces : Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, so there is still a very long way to go if Promods want to make Ontario. ;)
(which I don't know if they want to make it)
On my end, I live in New Brunswick, so I expect my province to be made in... probably 10 to 12 years. :) However, that would give me plenty of time to practice my skills and hopefully be able to create some nice areas myself. Always thought I could do more than just touristic signs on ETS2...

Regarding the different scenarios, I firmly believe that plan A is the best, so people can start driving to Canada. There aren't a lot of map expansions in ATS, and Promods Canada will definitely make a difference. This would also give you more time and less pressure to work on the new zones, while players might help you fixing potential bugs in released areas. Option D has also a downside: if you add the BC-99, you might need to add Whistler - not necessarily as a city but definitely as a go-through place - and possibly Squamish. Which could delay the release even more.

By releasing Lillooet and Pemberton afterwards, you allow players to discover British Columbia step by step while focusing on the next steps for your map. It's a win-win situation. Not necessarily a bad thing at all.

Re: Development on version 1.x (British Columbia Edition)

Posted: 28 Apr 2020 08:30
by hangman005
Personally I'd go with A.... but that's because I have zero patience lol.

Re: Development on version 1.x (British Columbia Edition)

Posted: 29 Apr 2020 15:52
by SarigYogir
I think C would be the best option. It seems silly to me to have ajungrei93’s work available but not use it, however option C wouldn't take as long to implement as B or D. Then you could work on implementing option D in a later update. Personally I wouldn't mind waiting for C, hopefully it would take so long as everyone's at home.

Re: Development on version 1.x (British Columbia Edition)

Posted: 29 Apr 2020 18:02
by 34ilikepie
krzysiukud42 wrote:
23 Apr 2020 16:34
Hi!Is it possible for the province of Ontario to appear sometime?

Dodano po 56 sekundach:
Hi!Is it possible for the province of Ontario to appear sometime?
Yes just ignore the Rocky Mountains, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba only to reach Ontario. It takes a couple of days to drive from Ontario to BC and vice versa, and driving within Ontario is massive alone from Windsor to the Quebec border is 8 hours, from Toronto to Kenora is about a 20 hour drive. From Ontario it takes 2 days to drive to the Maritimes and it takes 2-4 days to drive the Western Provinces and even longer to the Territories (Yukon and the Northwest Territories; Nunavut doesn't have roads.) Canada and it's provinces are massive except the Maritimes.

Re: Development on version 1.x (British Columbia Edition)

Posted: 30 Apr 2020 01:08
by Gabriel T
Hello to you, it takes around 8 hours from Windsor, ON. to QC. Border on 401 at 100 km/h average speed (828 km).

Re: Development on version 1.x (British Columbia Edition)

Posted: 01 May 2020 15:21
by DannyKR
From the video, it's quite good. But when I look at the map it somehow seems a bit small.
If you imagine how big the map map for ETS2 is. But it can also be because I am so spoiled because of the size of the card, I mean.

Re: Development on version 1.x (British Columbia Edition)

Posted: 01 May 2020 17:19
by Mprochazka
That's because it's first version if you look at first version of european promods which was 7 years ago it was also small and it grew gradually over the years to its current size

Re: Development on version 1.x (British Columbia Edition)

Posted: 02 May 2020 15:55
by RobertKNL
Also I think the amount of detail in that map is going to be exceptional. They have always been quality over quantity and I feel like this is going to be another level

Re: Development on version 1.x (British Columbia Edition)

Posted: 02 May 2020 21:33
by DannyKR
Yes, I agree with you on all points! However, I find the size of the card too small and, in my view, has no relation to the effort and work. Do you understand what i mean But I can really feel that I am so spoiled by the size at ETS.