Page 9 of 10

Re: Inclusion of conflicted areas

Posted: 31 Aug 2015 23:16
by martinusK
Michael Rosen wrote:Well NATO is not helping anybody so yeah...
This topic should be locked IMHO

Re: Inclusion of conflicted areas

Posted: 01 Sep 2015 08:44
by orestescm76
...
why?
they are discussing like normal people.
nobody is fighting..

Re: Inclusion of conflicted areas

Posted: 01 Sep 2015 18:36
by n4gix.bill.leaming
Because even if it was decided to be done, it would not even show up for several years?

Re: Inclusion of conflicted areas

Posted: 01 Sep 2015 21:46
by KubaJAM
And because it is only a certain amount of time before the proverbial better idiot comes along ;).

Re: Inclusion of conflicted areas

Posted: 02 Sep 2015 12:48
by Rocar 512E
I think he is coming.

Re: Inclusion of conflicted areas

Posted: 02 Sep 2015 19:04
by AlexanderPope
Personally I think this is a simulator game. The fact is the many real life truckers going to Crimea pass through two checkpoints on both sides, and on the Crimean side they are under Russian regulations. However we may feel about the situation in the Ukraine, I think this game should reflect real life and reflect what's actually happening on the ground. If things change, it won't be too hard to just switch the flags and remove the excess checkpoints.

Re: Inclusion of conflicted areas

Posted: 02 Sep 2015 19:29
by Rocar 512E
Unfortuanatley, some people are so butthurt because of their political views, they will go here and just say that...............................

Re: Inclusion of conflicted areas

Posted: 02 Sep 2015 23:01
by KubaJAM
That's a really tasteless way to describe people's political views, after all it is a highly sensitive issue in some countries currently.

Re: Inclusion of conflicted areas

Posted: 03 Sep 2015 04:32
by Rocar 512E
Yes, what to say, ppl are sensible

Re: Inclusion of conflicted areas

Posted: 03 Sep 2015 09:49
by LA-MJ
that word does not mean what you think it does ;)