Page 90 of 269

Re: Development on version 2.x (Balkan Area)

Posted: 23 Sep 2017 13:56
by zmaj_od_istre
I left Rijeka to see how you did A6 (Rijeka - Zagreb). And while you started well (Čavle, Grobnik - which could have few houses and structures along the road), I am a bit dissapointed by the section in Gorski kotar. I am more than aware of the limitations of the map and the road length, and obviously making the highway faithful to reality is difficult. But again, this is a very mountainious region, while in the game it is basically flat. It would be nice if in next version you could add few mountains around.

As this is how it looks in reality.
https://adriaticmedianethr.files.wordpr ... 400&crop=1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A6_(Croat ... roatia.JPG

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A6_(Croat ... 6_0509.jpg

https://www.arz.hr/dionice/images/DE-RG_1.jpg

Re: Development on version 2.x (Balkan Area)

Posted: 24 Sep 2017 13:38
by Bisinus
Hey guys,
in my recent trip to Bosnia and Herzegovina I also went to Republica Srpska, one of the two entities in the country, and I saw many serbian red-blue-white flags and at the border to the bosnian federation serbian welcome signs for Republic of Srpska.
So I ask, if you add them, when you will build the country or not, because of political issues? :) ;)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Balkan Area)

Posted: 24 Sep 2017 16:28
by Nectaria Coutayar
^^ Countries have to exist before you can add them into a virtual environment that wants to simulate the real world.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Balkan Area)

Posted: 24 Sep 2017 19:46
by Nathan_A_RF
Bisinus wrote:
24 Sep 2017 13:38
...in my recent trip to Bosnia and Herzegovina...
Do you mean Croatia? We haven't build Bosnia and Herzegovina yet. The flags are all correct, but as you say politically unstable areas in real life such as Kosovo will not be built until real life conflict is resolved. We stay out of those areas to avoid conflict between people if it was built.

(P.S. Do not start any conversation involving a disputed territory's status, or the message will be ignored/deleted)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Balkan Area)

Posted: 24 Sep 2017 20:49
by Bisinus
Nathan_A_RF wrote:
24 Sep 2017 19:46
Bisinus wrote:
24 Sep 2017 13:38
...in my recent trip to Bosnia and Herzegovina...
Do you mean Croatia? We haven't build Bosnia and Herzegovina yet. The flags are all correct, but as you say politically unstable areas in real life such as Kosovo will not be built until real life conflict is resolved. We stay out of those areas to avoid conflict between people if it was built.

(P.S. Do not start any conversation involving a disputed territory's status, or the message will be ignored/deleted)

No, I was there in real Life :)
Sorry for misunderstanding

Re: Development on version 2.x (Balkan Area)

Posted: 25 Sep 2017 15:21
by Qixiwi
I think there aren't any political issues so first parts of Bonia and Herzegovina might come in next major update.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Balkan Area)

Posted: 25 Sep 2017 15:26
by Nathan_A_RF
A corridor across one part of the Balkans is nearly finished and should come in an update soon (don't ask me when)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Balkan Area)

Posted: 25 Sep 2017 15:43
by Qixiwi
I know. It's ready when it's ready.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Balkan Area)

Posted: 25 Sep 2017 17:50
by brainiac
Nathan_A_RF wrote:
25 Sep 2017 15:26
A corridor across one part of the Balkans is nearly finished and should come in an update soon (don't ask me when)
I am not sure for "soon".

Re: Development on version 2.x (Balkan Area)

Posted: 25 Sep 2017 21:19
by Darkfizch
Are you talking about a corridor to Greece?