Page 93 of 113

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 30 Apr 2017 12:34
by Teurov
Hi,
I know it was discussed but it wasn't in priority that times.
So,is Gotland in priority now? :?:

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 30 Apr 2017 13:21
by Akula_
RobertKNL wrote:Also be wary of the GPS liking you to get off highways and then quickly to another, even though there is a very solid interchange not far away, in some cities.
Happens everytime when you leave paris or be (wrong conjugaison inbound) near Austria/Slovakia, GPS always send you down to the small route instead of taking the motorway not even far from here that allows greater speed, and without loos of it when you need to get on and off

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 30 Apr 2017 22:25
by Arvidsson-Källqvist
RobertKNL wrote:But planning ahead yourself is part of the fun for me
THIS! Why some people would like to dumb down this game (khm "simulator") so much is above me... Planning your route ahead should be mandatory IMO. The routes planed by the ingame GPS are horribily dumb in 5 out of 10 times. So don't be that lazy. ;)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 01 May 2017 08:29
by RobertKNL
It gets better when you will run out of time and have to find a few truck stops along the route (and everytime you check how many hours you have left).

I also respect the delivery times, so when I notice I will be too early I find a stop and chill for a bit, or when I'm close to my headquarters I park the trailer in my yard and sleep inside.

Now I'm actually working at a haulage company I notice how much more challenging you can make the game (but also how much room for improvement there is for SCS)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 01 May 2017 09:57
by BrunoAlexLUX
Good to know that I'm not the only one doing that ;)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 01 May 2017 23:45
by Arvidsson-Källqvist
I do exactly the same too Robert. :)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 02 May 2017 09:14
by RobertKNL
I've seen your pictures Arvidsson, you lift realism to a whole new level D:

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 02 May 2017 10:02
by plykkegaard
Deadmau11 wrote:In your plans put the Odense Steel Shipyard? It would be fun to carry varied naval components :).
Odense Staalskibsværft (Lindøværftet) was closed in 2012
The site has been transformed to an industrial park housing a large number of companies within the offshore sector.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odense_Steel_Shipyard

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 18 Jun 2017 10:25
by mateush05
Any plans to rebuild Malmö?

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 18 Jun 2017 14:28
by Ostpuff
No major rebuilds are planned for Malmö. Some interchanges may be rebuilt on the E6 but other than that nothing, it looks good for the most part.
As the plans stand right now, the next city up for a rebuild is Göteborg. It's in a much worse state than Malmö.