Page 94 of 113

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 21 Jun 2017 09:14
by Shiva
There are some parts of Göteborg that look ok too.
Scenery, harbour, bridge and Scania.
I have had ideas how to rebuild.
But sadly lacking the skills.
I do trust that Ostpuff and ProMods team will do a good job.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 21 Jun 2017 13:05
by Ostpuff
Most of Göteborg looks good (and accurate) scenery-wise. It's the road network and the interchanges that are very inaccurately represented (E6, Rv40 and especially the E20, it's a regular 1+1 road instead of a 3+3 motorway!)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 21 Jun 2017 21:24
by Noah_Lukas
I think the existing part of sweden is good enough to drive on at the moment it could be better to focus on the rest of sweden ;)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 23 Jun 2017 00:33
by Shiva
Ostpuff wrote:
21 Jun 2017 13:05
Most of Göteborg looks good (and accurate) scenery-wise. It's the road network and the interchanges that are very inaccurately represented (E6, Rv40 and especially the E20, it's a regular 1+1 road instead of a 3+3 motorway!)
I agree on that.
Rv40 connected to Söderleden incorrectly. "can be fixed"
E20 connected to E6 at Kallebäcksmotet, incorrectly. "can be fixed"
Harbour to Oscarsleden to the bridge could be done better.

I would be so evil that I would remove Norrleden and Söderleden from the game, to save place. "They do take a LOT of space.
Adjust Göteborg towards west a bit.
Add Gullbersmotet, connect it to E20 east and E45 to the harbour, via tunnel.
Connect Rv40 to E6/E20 at the right place. "where "E20 splits ingame currently"

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 24 Jun 2017 08:15
by Ostpuff
Noah_Lukas wrote:
21 Jun 2017 21:24
it could be better to focus on the rest of sweden
Doing one does not have to exclude the other, and it's nice to have a change of enviroment every once in a while ;)

Göteborg has always felt a bit neglected for it's size, compared to Stockholm and Malmö, both in the original PM Scandinavia and in the SCS DLC. Neither of the versions have properly represented the road network nor the overall feeling of Göteborg imo. Not to forget a rebuild has been heavily requested.
Shiva wrote:
23 Jun 2017 00:33
I would be so evil that I would remove Norrleden and Söderleden from the game, to save place.
Adjust Göteborg towards west a bit.
I have considered doing that, as they can both be replaced with Lundbyleden and Götatunneln respectively. Norrleden especially really doesn't make much sense. Götatunneln is kind of a must anyhow, the detours you currently have to take to get to the ferry are ridiculous.

Nothing's set in stone though... :mrgreen:

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 25 Jun 2017 07:29
by Shiva
Ostpuff, my original idea had both Lundbyleden and Götatunneln, but that might be too much, sadly.
Götatunneln, that I would prefer.
Keeping most of the scenery, but rebuilding the roads from the bridge to Gullbersmotet.

You all developers do good work.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 26 Jun 2017 16:59
by Reyes9
Is anyone working on something in Southern Norway? I mean south of Oslo? For example Drammen (which is pretty much already in the game as part of Oslo) and other cities between Kristiansand and Oslo?

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 26 Jun 2017 17:03
by Vøytek
No. We're not working south of Oslo at the moment. We're more interested in the north, which is empty ;)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 26 Jun 2017 18:13
by Reyes9
Makes sense :) Seen the new cities north of Oslo. Looks briliant. What about on the west-side of Norway?

Re: Development on version 2.x (Southern Scandinavia)

Posted: 26 Jun 2017 21:07
by Noah_Lukas
They are on it ;)