Page 39 of 95

Re: Development on version 2.x (Northern Scandinavia)

Posted: 14 Dec 2016 01:32
by archangel_80
Haven't been driving in a while, but I downloaded the latest version recently and went up to Umeå, and am atm working my way up to Longyearbyen at Svalbard.
You've really done a nice job with Sundsvall, the High Coast Bridge, Örnsköldsvik and Umeå. Very nice scenery!

I was wondering what the status is right now, what are you working on at the moment?

I'm very keen on LV335 Örnsköldsvik > Sollefteå, and RV87 Sollefteå > Östersund, and am longing to be able to drive there...

Keep up the good work!

Re: Development on version 2.x (Northern Scandinavia)

Posted: 14 Dec 2016 03:31
by Vøytek
I think there were screenshots from Åre and you have to get there somehow... So maybe through Sollefteå and Östersund? ;)
https://www.google.pl/maps/dir/%C3%96rn ... 63.3990428

Re: Development on version 2.x (Northern Scandinavia)

Posted: 19 Dec 2016 04:17
by torsein
well, the road between biri and frya is still the same, only frya-sjoa that is new, and it's allready open no. i did woork a half year at the roadwork there, but wuld have been intresting to have the new and old e6 there, since they have planed to do some rework on the old, like to make the streets more "green"
Shiva wrote:torsein, there seems to be no streetviews of the completed sections between, Biri and Otta.
I found this for the stretch Sjoa-Frya E6
Not streetview, but not bad at all!
The facebook page has more info too https://www.facebook.com/e6oyerotta .

Could be a very interesting road if developers add the roads that will open and those that are already opened of the new E6.
+ possibilities for ETS roadwork deliveries

Re: Development on version 2.x (Northern Scandinavia)

Posted: 07 Jan 2017 20:12
by capital_logistics
I must say it feels a little bit empty when entering Umeå City. Is there any plans to add at least some of the landmark buildings to the skyline?

Image

Re: Development on version 2.x (Northern Scandinavia)

Posted: 07 Jan 2017 22:27
by astronomer
For example Berlin is boring :( and next cities. But, I hope, that in future will arrive news models ;) :)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Northern Scandinavia)

Posted: 08 Jan 2017 13:25
by BarrGDA
astronomer wrote:For example Berlin is boring :( and next cities. But, I hope, that in future will arrive news models ;) :)
Berlin is boring? :lol:

Re: Development on version 2.x (Northern Scandinavia)

Posted: 08 Jan 2017 15:09
by Barrett_killz
astronomer wrote:For example Berlin is boring :( and next cities. But, I hope, that in future will arrive news models ;) :)
LOL. Try taking any route to Berlin with the GPS turned off and without using the map. Good luck.

Re: Development on version 2.x (Northern Scandinavia)

Posted: 08 Jan 2017 16:00
by astronomer
Barrett_killz wrote:
astronomer wrote:For example Berlin is boring :( and next cities. But, I hope, that in future will arrive news models ;) :)
LOL. Try taking any route to Berlin with the GPS turned off and without using the map. Good luck.
I say about feeling from Berlin, no about quantity roads. Houses are mostly from Scandinavia assets, historical sight is little. Nice models also little. It is my feeling from Berlin. I have like diverse details, no quantity roads ;)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Northern Scandinavia)

Posted: 08 Jan 2017 16:25
by Ostpuff
capital_logistics wrote:I must say it feels a little bit empty when entering Umeå City. Is there any plans to add at least some of the landmark buildings to the skyline?
Kulturväven was one of my wishes but models are hard to come by, perhaps it'll happen in the future ;)

Re: Development on version 2.x (Northern Scandinavia)

Posted: 08 Jan 2017 16:29
by pauliaxz
Having loads of models increases already large mod size.
Also game loading time is affected.